• rss
  • archive
  • Weakness = Strength

    image
    Kerala, a beautiful region in Southwest India, is now marketing their monsoon season as the ideal time to visit. 
    Most travelers do their best to avoid monsoon in Asia when planning a trip. And rightfully so—the rain can keep you locked up in your hotel room, and never mind the flooding. 
     
    But the idea is actually starting to make an impact. Monsoon season is apparently the best time to rejuvenate the mind, body and soul: “According to Ayurveda,” the site claims, “Monsoon is the best season for rejuvenation therapies.” It’s intriguing, isn’t it? Experiencing a time of year the most people deliberately avoid. 
     
    So while it may seem like a crazy way to increase tourism, it’s clever positioning. No one else would dare market the rainy season, so such a move usually also means you’ll own that message in customers’ minds

    • 2 years ago
    • #positioning
  • The Affiliates of Rajasthan

    We know of affiliates mostly as online affiliates: Individuals willing to advertise your product on their site and take a cut of any sale originating from their source. Offline affiliates are akin to salespeople that get a commission. In North America it’s hard to find true offline affiliates since most salespeople are hired and paid, with a commission as a bonus. In India, however, offline affiliates are abundant and they’re amazingly good at what they do. 

    In the streets of arid cities in Rajasthan, I’ve come across various types of affiliates. The first kind is the tour guide. Walk into some of the many temples or free sights and a man will volunteer himself as your guide. No asking about a fee (sometimes he’ll say he does this for free) and give you a long tour. They are very nice, offering to take pictures of you, telling you historical anecdotes, and they even throw in personal stories about themselves and their family. For instance, one guide we had said his great grandfather helped to carve the temple we were visiting—easily believable.

    At the end of the tour, you expect them to ask for a small payment to them and when they don’t, you feel bad. Then they say, “I have a shop right next store where I do paintings and I was wondering if you could come and see it.” How can you say no after a free half-hour tour? You can say no if you want, but most people with a conscience can’t. They deftly exercise one of Cialdini’s principles of influence:Reciprocity.

    It’s quite brilliant, actually. Their shops are usually exactly the same to the other tourist traps in the area, but there’s another team of salesmen inside who do a good job of selling you stuff you don’t want. Most items are pretty cheap, so it’s not a big deal. 

    The second affiliate I’ve found is the taxi/rickshaw driver. Being in a foreign place, you need recommendations of some kind—for restaurants especially. Often times the guides don’t know the real local favorites, or they list too many to choose from. Or, you’re in a place where no Lonely Planet can save you. You ask your driver, “Do you know of a good lunch place?” and they say, “I can take you to the best restaurant in the city.” When you get there, the parking lot is filled with taxis. Most patrons inside are tourists. And it’s clear that the food is not the best in the city. 

    I’ve had this happen in Bali, Vietnam, and Thailand. Especially on scheduled day trips, the bus driver will stop at shops and restaurants along the way that they are clearly getting a cut from. 

    All of this to say, online affiliates are pretty passive in comparison. These guys will walk with you for hours, take you on a tour of a city for free, and then ask for a small purchase in return. It’s hard to identify who is genuinely wanting to help you and who is an affiliate with an ulterior agenda. More often than not, it’s the latter. 

    • 2 years ago
  • Are you doing something you love?

    image Simple: it doesn’t feel like work. 
    If you are doing something you love, you won’t work a day in your life. How sweet would that be? 
     
    This thinking, however, gets a lot of people in trouble. When they are on the right career path but have to endure a menial job for the first few years, many bail early in search of something else. If they would have stayed with it, there is a chance that they would find their passion in a higher-up role. But there’s also a chance they wouldn’t have and could be waking up every morning with a feeling of dread and persistent monotony. Then what?
     
    My advice would be the following:
     
    1) Is there something you really love doing? If yes, proceed to step 3. 
     
    2) If not, try to find what makes you happy. Anything at all. 
     
    3) Once you know what you love doing, and could do that forever and be happy (even if you don’t get paid), don’t quit your job just yet!
     
    4) If you have expenses that your current job is paying for—like a car, house,expensive coffee drinking habits—then quitting your job is a risky move. First, test your passion. At nights, on the weekends. Do it, read about it, write about it. Immerse yourself in that world and test the waters. If that works for you, and you still love what you are doing, proceed to step 6.
     
    5) If you are living with your parents still, have little expenses, or tons of cash, quitting your job shouldn’t be a tough decision. Always seek advice of friends and family, but most importantly, industry experts.
     
    6) Survey your financial options. If your passion isn’t lucrative, or involves financial risk, then it’s best to lower your expenses before you take the leap. Work out what you need to survive and make it your goal to earn that amount pursuing what you love. Sometimes, pursuing your passion can be lucrative, but most often it isn’t (and in the startup/business case, it usually isn’t at first). Giving up your expensive habits to find your long lost passion is worth it. Happiness is priceless!
     
    Once you have found what you need to do in order to do what you love doing, take the leap. Make sure you minimize risk (especially if you have a family/dependents) so that failure doesn’t ruin you. And then go with all your heart. Spend every waking moment of that initial driving energy and do what you do best. 
     
    If you do leap, and it doesn’t work out, at least you can say you tried. If you have enough chutzpah, you can hopefully get back up and try again. If, however, it does work out, and you are waking up every morning excited and happy, then you are set for life!

    • 2 years ago
  • B-School vs. E-School

    In Steve Blank’s talk at the Startup Lessons Learned conference, he highlights the difference between what it takes to be an entrepreneur vs. a business manager. Basically, he’s saying that what’s taught in MBA programs is only partially helpful. I couldn’t agree more. 

    Most of what you learn in business school is how to run a business. Primarily how to be a CEO or business manager in a large company. Understanding financial accounting, marketing, organizational behavior, economic theory, and the list of requisite classes goes on. While these are great skills to have, none of them come into play when starting a startup, especially a lean startup.

    As the slide above states, being an entrepreneur isn’t applying what you’ve learned in the past, but what you are learning as you go. Your customers are your teachers and you are the student. You must throw away your business plan and instead focus on trying to find a scalable and repeatable business model. This means testing out hypotheses, often being very wrong, until you create a product that people are dying for. Having an MBA won’t help you here, and what Steve Blank has been teaching at Stanford is how all business schools should be approaching entrepreneurship. There’s no formula for success. There are formulas to help you succeed, but if your customers hate your product, your knowledge of venture financing isn’t going to change that. 
    So for those of you who have gone to B-School and want to create web products, forget what you learned and start asking questions. Get out of the building, talk to customers, and start learning again. A Lea(r)n Startup!

    • 3 years ago
    • #lean
  • Decisions, Decisions

    image

    Most people have a tough time making decisions. And it’s not even the big decisions that people despise settling on, but more the tiny everyday small choices that cause angst.

    A well known theory in Behavioral Economics called the Prospect Theory may be able to explain why. 

    The common problem most of us have is that we are risk averse. We constantly do as much as we can to minimize loss. But often, as the theory shows, we fear making a bad decision more than we should. Losses are disproportionally weighted when compared to gains. Basically, our pain of losing isn’t balanced with the joy of gaining. 
    This is different for everyone, but an example might help. Let’s say on your way to the Sarah’s Smash Shack you walk by me on the street and I give you $100—pretty sweet, right? But later, when you realize that Sarah’s Smash Shack closed, you decide to take a cab home and instead of giving the cabbie at $10 bill you give him the $100 bill by accident. That would really suck! The pain of making that mistake would outweigh the joy you received from the free $100 (even though you got a free cab ride out of it!). That’s a mistake you would regret for ever—I could have been $100 richer than I am now! What an idiot I am! 
     
    The pain associated with making mistakes like this is what causes us to deliberate on deciding and often can result in making a bad decision because all we were focusing on was minimizing risk. To solve this, you could sit there and calculate the ACTUAL pain of loss versus the real utility of making the right choice. But that is tough since if we new what our real preference was at the outset (and especially the probability of our choice being correct), we would go about never making a mistake. You can use this calculation when you have time, especially for bigger decisions, but what about the small ones?
     
    The utility gained from small decisions usually doesn’t warrant the painful deliberation we engage in. Should I get a BLT or a burger? It really doesn’t matter that much. And it’s much easier to say “I should have done something else” instead of saying “who knows if the other choice really was that much better?” The incremental gain in happiness is so small and transient that it doesn’t matter either way. I can have a BLT tomorrow.
     
    This notion of happiness, or objective utility, isn’t a hard figure. Expectations can play a big role in joy and so can Cognitive dissonance. Happiness is all in your head, and if you want, almost entirely in your control. Your expectations set the bar, and so do the circumstances.
     
    Which movie should you see at the theatres? Well, the ones with the best reviews of course. But that would make for little room for error. High expectations can make great movies look like crap, and crappy movies pretty darn good. Keep that in mind when delberating over a decision—the best one isn’t always the best.
     
    Also to consider is cognitive dissonance. We can trick ourselves into liking something even if we don’t. And we wouldn’t even know it. For example, if you were dying to see the most popular movie, but really hate waiting in line, you might persuade your buddies to see something else instead. And if that second choice wasn’t great, you are weighing it against the alternative, which was waiting for hours in a congested line. You also have to defend your decision and convincing you and your friends that the second movie was actually pretty good allows you to avoid guilt and save face.
     
    SO keep in mind, when you are standing at the Starbucks counter and are deciding between a Grande and a Venti, that your satisfaction with your decision is entirely arbitrary. It’s ultimately your happiness that’s at stake, not anyone else’s. Also remember that the outcome isn’t always so cut and dry. Situational factors are at play and can blur your hindsight.
     
    Another example of the maleability of happiness WRT decision making:
     
    If I want to get a good night sleep tonight, should I get the drink that has 13% caffeine per serving or the one that is 84% caffeine free per serving?
     
    When you think about it, both are relatively the same choice. But we’re more inclined to choose the caffeine free drink even though it has slightly more caffeine. This is called Hedonic Framing and when making quick decisions, can prove to sway us one way or another. If something is framed as a negative loss vs. a positive gain, we are more inclined to choose the gain even though it may have the exact same outcome. We can avoid this pointless deliberation and miscalculated risk aversion by realizing how things are framed.
     
    One more trick: You can  break up your gains (or utility) into smaller chunks, and group your losses into a lump sum. Since each loss is marginally worse than a corresponding gain, more losses mean even more suffering when aggregated. But if you think of lots of small loses as one big loss, it’s easier to cope. 
    • 3 years ago
    • #priorities
  • B-School vs. E-School

    image

    In Steve Blank’s talk at the Startup Lessons Learned conference, he highlights the difference between what it takes to be an entrepreneur vs. a business manager. Basically, he’s saying that what’s taught in MBA programs is only partially helpful. I couldn’t agree more. 

    Most of what you learn in business school is how to run a business. Primarily how to be a CEO or business manager in a large company. Understanding financial accounting, marketing, organizational behavior, economic theory, and the list of requisite classes goes on. While these are great skills to have, none of them come into play when starting a startup, especially a lean startup.

    As the slide above states, being an entrepreneur isn’t applying what you’ve learned in the past, but what you are learning as you go. Your customers are your teachers and you are the student. You must throw away your business plan and instead focus on trying to find a scalable and repeatable business model. This means testing out hypotheses, often being very wrong, until you create a product that people are dying for. Having an MBA won’t help you here, and what Steve Blank has been teaching at Stanford is how all business schools should be approaching entrepreneurship. There’s no formula for success. There are formulas to help you succeed, but if your customers hate your product, your knowledge of venture financing isn’t going to change that. 

    So for those of you who have gone to B-School and want to create web products, forget what you learned and start asking questions. Get out of the building, talk to customers, and start learning again. A Lea(r)n Startup!

    • 3 years ago
    • #lean
© 2013
Previous page
  • Page 2 / 2